As an individual in this school, I see it (individually) as a problem that another individual is giving the site base an individualistic representation of the student body. On a personal, interactive level outside of school organizations and the such, this individual and I are on good terms. However, when it comes to clubs, tensions rise and this person can really get under my skin.
In attendance of a site base meeting, I was impressed with how smooth the agenda progressed and how each topic went uninterrupted. However, when it came time for our school to entrust one student to represent the whole student body, hell broke loose (to me, individually…) I think she managed to merely scrape the surface of the true thoughts of the student body, which was then, within seconds, thwarted by her own bias opinion about the situation which was at hand. This persons particular position isn’t to provide her individual, unique thoughts on the issue, but to be the medium for the student body, for her to convey our thoughts and ideas to the site base council.
What this person reported may have correctly corresponded with the ideas and liking which conform with her group of friends and age group, but it is doubtful that she received input from the various other groups and ages. I don’t believe there was a survey or anything of the sort passed around the school to retrieve correct results to which they could present.
All my point is saying is that are student body is being mal-represented by someone who can’t quite fulfill her job.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment